Currency Discovery In Rajya Sabha Sparks Controversy, Investigation Underway

New Delhi, 6th December 2024: A controversy arose in the Rajya Sabha on December 5 after Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar revealed that a bundle of currency notes had been found during a routine security check in the House. Dhankhar stated that the notes, believed to be Rs 500 bills, were discovered at seat 222, which is assigned to Abhishek Manu Singhvi. He explained that after being informed of the discovery, he deemed it necessary to initiate an investigation by the law, which is currently underway.

Dhankhar also made a lighthearted remark, suggesting that the discovery might reflect on the economy, asking whether it was possible that people could “forget” money. He emphasized the importance of sending a message about the growing reliance on formal economies, urging support for the investigation.

Opposition members raised objections when Singhvi’s name was mentioned, with Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge arguing that a conclusion should only be made after the investigation. He also questioned how Singhvi’s seat could be linked to the incident before the investigation concluded.

Singhvi himself responded on social media, stating he was hearing about the incident for the first time. He explained his schedule on the day in question, clarifying that he had only carried a single Rs 500 note with him to the Rajya Sabha.

Dhankhar clarified that he could not determine if the currency was genuine or counterfeit, adding that the investigation would uncover that detail. He assured that, based on electronic records, it was confirmed that Singhvi had signed into the House that day.

Minister of Parliamentary Affairs Kiren Rijiju supported the Chairman’s actions, questioning the opposition’s objection to revealing the member’s seat and name. He emphasized the need for an investigation, particularly given the context of India’s shift toward a digital economy, and questioned the appropriateness of carrying cash in the House.

Leader of the House J.P. Nadda also backed the investigation, suggesting that the opposition was only concerned about disruptions when the ruling benches raised issues. He called for a fair investigation and stressed that the seriousness of the situation warranted attention. Dhankhar reiterated that he had not accused anyone, while Kharge responded, saying that the opposition’s position was simply to call for an investigation before drawing any conclusions.